SCORE ONE FOR US!

SCORE ONE FOR US! - Hallo friendsGOOD OF CONEX NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title SCORE ONE FOR US!, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article health, Article news, Article sport, Article tips, Article treatment, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : SCORE ONE FOR US!
link : SCORE ONE FOR US!

Read too


SCORE ONE FOR US!

Trump can't block users 

on Twitter, federal judge 

rules



By: Tom Kludt
CNN
23 May 2018


A federal judge in New York ruled Wednesday that President Trump is in violation of the Constitution when he blocks users on Twitter.

The decision is a remarkable coda to one of the more peculiar debates of Trump's presidency, and a victory for the First Amendment advocates who brought the lawsuit last year.
In her ruling, Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald wrote that "no government official -- including the President -- is above the law, and all government officials are presumed to follow the law as has been declared."
"We hold that portions of the @realDonaldTrump account -- the 'interactive space' where Twitter users may directly engage with the content of the President's tweets -- are properly analyzed under the "'public forum' doctrines set forth by the Supreme Court, that such space is a designated public forum, and that the blocking of the plaintiffs based on their political speech constitutes viewpoint discrimination that violates the First Amendment," Buchwald wrote.
But Buchwald eschewed a decision on providing defendants with relief, saying that her "declaratory judgment should be sufficient."
The Knight Institute, which filed the suit on behalf of several individuals who have been blocked by Trump, applauded the decision.
"We're pleased with the court's decision, which reflects a careful application of core First Amendment principles to government censorship on a new communications platform," said Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight Institute. "The President's practice of blocking critics on Twitter is pernicious and unconstitutional, and we hope this ruling will bring it to an end."
Katie Fallow, a staff attorney at Knight who represented the plaintiffs, said the ruling "should guide all of the public officials who are communicating with their constituents through social media."
The Justice Department defended Trump's Twitter activity, contending that muting is within the president's "associational freedoms." He may be president, the DOJ argued, but Trump still maintains a right to decide who he spends time with on the social media platform.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders and former White House communications director Hope Hicks, both of whom were named in the suit, were dismissed as defendants.
The ruling arrives as something of a surprise, given what transpired at a hearing in March. At that time, Judge Buchwald urged both parties to find a resolution outside of court. Her idea for a settlement: perhaps Trump could mute, rather than block, his critics.
"Why are we here?" Buchwald asked at the hearing. "Don't we have a solution that serves the interests of the plaintiffs, serves the interests of the president?"
"It might be better to resolve it in a practical fashion," she added.
After the March hearing, Fallow indicated that she was amenable to Buchwald's proposal.
"As to the muting, I think that is an option," Fallow said at the time. "That is much less restrictive and burdensome on the plaintiffs' speech rights."
But some of the plaintiffs were less enthused by the idea. Outside the Manhattan courthouse in March, Philip Cohen, a sociology professor who was blocked by the president in June of last year, said that muting wouldn't resolve the underlying problem.
"I don't know if muting is really the solution, but if all they really care about, which they say, is that he just doesn't want to hear from us, then he would mute, but obviously he wants to suppress our speech," he said.

NOTE: Trumps actions in blocking folks on Twitter that he "doesn't like" perfectly illustrates why he is so unfit to be President.  Well, this and his ignorance, belligerence, unwillingness to obey the law, and his hyper partisan view of what his role is.  What Trump fails to grasp, is that he is no longer a private citizen whoh can do whatever the hell he pleases and no one can tell him otherwise.  Well, judge Buchwald just told him one slice of the reality of what it means to be President of the United States of America.





A Small Victory But Kudos To The Folks Who Sued Trump!  RESIST



Thus Article SCORE ONE FOR US!

That's an article SCORE ONE FOR US! This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article SCORE ONE FOR US! with the link address https://coneknews.blogspot.com/2018/05/score-one-for-us.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "SCORE ONE FOR US!"

Post a Comment